James Bond Turning Fifty: What's Happened Over the Years?

From Sean Connery to Daniel Craig: Is 007 Getting Better?

August 6, 2012
Daniel CraigSource: Getty Images

Daniel Craig: The Latest 007

Entertainment Weekly magazine just had a cover about the cinematic James Bond turning fifty. (The literary 007 is actually older) but as I looked at the picture of Sean Connery, I had to wonder what happened to that version of male hero. 007 doesn't seem to be quite the man he was.

Not that there's anything wrong with Daniel Craig, or any of the other Bonds who succeeded Connery. Geroge Lazenby was a great looking Australian model, but he could only sustain one film. Then, Roger Moore took the reins and brought an extra measure of tongue-in-cheek humor to the role. Timothy Dalton always seemed as if there were someplace else he wanted to be. Just when Pierce Brosnan accumulated sufficient gravitas to be believable as Bond, the producers dropped him for Daniel Craig. Daniel Craig... a blond Bond? Hmmm.

What was it about Connery that so indelibly branded him as 007? Somebody once said that Connery was the only Bond who could be menacing. But there was more to his allure than that.

The Connery 007 drank, smoked, drove fast and killed in cold blood. You could never envision him having a mani-ped, or twizzling product-infused hair into the tonsorial architecture favored by many men today. Though he dressed well, he was no dandy. I just couldn't imagine him in a 3-way mirror checking to see if his slacks gave his glutes the proper perky silhouette. Connery was well built, but naturally athletic - without the over-sculpted gym-rat physique of Jersey Shore males — and Daniel Craig.

In one Craig 007 film, he lost his lady love and cried and pitched a boo hoo party. An admirable display of emotion for some other character perhaps, but would the real 007 ever involve himself that deeply? Who wants an emotionally available secret agent? Bond was never meant to be Mr. Right, he was Mr. Right Now and that may have been his most attractive attribute.

Since the character is a runaway fantasy, what nincompoop would want the pyrotechnic life-on-the-edge narrative to morph from Aston Martins and gunfights into wedding bells, a picket fence, orthodontic bills, 529's... oh, I'm making myself ill here. The whole point of a 007 fling would be the bittersweet, white-hot good-bye because without that, reality sets in.

I need a cold martini and a hot dose of the vintage, old school JB. The one who slapped his girlfriend's butt in Goldfinger and kicked Blofeld's cat in Diamonds Are Forever. Funny how twisted our cultural mores have become. 007 can still annihilate any number of human enemies and do gargantuan box office. But if he kicked that cat today, he'd be finished.

Share Your Thoughts
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted in your comment.

CAPTCHA
This tests that you are really a person and not a computer.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
Your Privacy
Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.
Steve | Oct 7, 2012
Read the novel "Casino Royale". Then come back and retract all the nonsense you spewed aboud Bond's emotional availability.
Mike | Aug 8, 2012
One can tell you have never read any of the James Bond books Flemming wrote. If you had you would realize Daniel Craig is the closest actor yet to the real Bond. Bond walked with a limp, covered with scars from knives and bullets. He drove a beat up old Aston Martin painted battleship gray called the locomotion. He was never dapper never Connery. Craig has done for Bond what Bale has done for Batman, he has made Bond real. He is who the author meant him to be, not a Hollywood cartoon fluff piece.
Pegster | Aug 7, 2012
I'm old enough to have grown up with the Bonds, starting with Sean Connery. (I have a son named Sean as a result of a fascination with the man, like so many other women of that era!!) I agree that Sean Connery is the ultimate James Bond because he was menacing;he was clearly without compunction or remorse; he was an unapologetic womanizer and misogynist, and that kind of Bond simply went out of style. Lazenby and Dalton don't require consideration. I thought that no one could surpass Roger Moore for his urbanity and his savoir-faire but he seemed a little long in the tooth from the beginning, like he was always sucking in his tummy. Pierce Brosnan is my favorite Bond. He seemed comfortable in the part and continued that touch of tongue-in-cheek humor that was started with Roger Moore. James Bond movies provided exciting entertainment with explosive openings, chases, unbelieveable escapes, beautiful women and evil villains. Daniel Craig's Bond provides much of that but the 2 movies he's been in are dark and mean, and far more graphic (think being beaten about the rear in "Casino Real." While it may have provided some motivation for the rest of the action, it was gratuitous torture. I'm not anxious to see the next Bond, and that's a shame. Bond movies were the only movies we ever went to the theater to see.
Anonymous | Aug 6, 2012
There was only ONE Bond. Sean Connery.
follow us
Subscribe to Newsletters
X
About Life Goes Strong Contributors
Newsletter Sign Up Friends
Newsletter Unsubscribe Contact Us
Mobile App Sitemap