Joyce Maynard Adopted Two Girls from Ethiopia Then Gave Them Up

Fourteen months after she adopted two girls from Ethiopia, Joyce Maynard knew the adoption had failed.

Joyce Maynard, who adopted 2 Ethiopian girls, in an old photo with her 3 biologiSource: getty Images

Joyce Maynard, who adopted 2 Ethiopian girls, in an old photo with her 3 biological children

What happens after a single woman has adopted two girls from Ethiopia and things don't go as planned?

Joyce Maynard, a prolific writer, often of raw truths about her life, is perhaps best known for her affair with J.D. Salinger. When they met, he was 53 and she was a freshman at Yale.

Salinger contacted her after Maynard, at age 18, appeared on the cover of the New York Times Magazine wearing jeans and red sneakers. Long straight hair and bangs, large eyes and lanky arms added to her waif-like appearance.

Maynard called her cover story "An 18-Year-Old Looks Back On Life." Some 25 years later, she published her memoir, At Home in the World, which explores the Salinger relationship in riveting detail.

She now has another dramatic story to tell.

Two nights ago, I headed downtown to the National Geographic Society in D.C. to hear Joyce Maynard speak about adventure travel. The evening began small with discussions of Guatemala, Mexico and China. Toward the end, in response to a question, she referred to Salinger as a bitter man who had written hundreds of letters to teenage girls.

In between, the audience became spellbound as Maynard spoke about her ultimate adventure journey three years ago at the age of 56: to Africa where she adopted two Ethiopian girls, ages 6 and 11, whose mother had died from an AIDS-related illness. In addition to brothers, the girls had a father, who was unable to care for them. 

Before traveling with them to her home in California, Maynard wanted her new daughters to experience their homeland; moreover, she herself wanted to learn more about the country that had produced her girls. She planned to write about their travels.

So Maynard set out on a road trip with the two girls, a driver, a photographer and a translator to explore the depths of Ethiopia. After hours of riding in a car that the photographer declared the scariest he had ever been in, he said he wanted out. Since the girls spoke almost no English, Maynard says she just held them very tight. She never did publish that article.

In time, Maynard was distraught to learn that on the Ethiopia trip, her new daughters had heard the translator say in their native tongue that Maynard was going to sell the girls after they arrived in the States.

Maynard wrote an article about the adoption for More Magazine, saying how "happy, happy, happy" she felt and reported to her fans things like the joy of "bringing them to the ocean for the first time and watching them chase waves."

Then, eight months after the adoption, Maynard went uncharacteristically silent. Last month she wrote a letter to her followers explaining her long absence. In that email, she acknowledged that "there was no shortage of love or care—and despite some very happy and good times—the adoption failed."

Maynard further said that she explained to the girls, "I made a promise, when I went to Ethiopia to bring them home, that I would make sure they had a good life in America.  I still took my promise as a firm commitment. But part of honoring it meant finding them two parents—a family with other children, and a big, wide net of a support system that I could not give them, myself."

When Maynard's failed adoption was reported in the New York Times, readers weighed in, some criticizing international adoption, many judging Maynard harshly for having given up her adopted daughters.

Without knowing to what extent she had thought out the adoption ahead of time, is it fair to judge her? Did she anticipate this possible conclusion and decide the upside was worth the risk? (Brangelina make it look so easy.)

As with many things in life (marriage/divorce for example) it is hard to know when to cut your losses. I don't mean to be glib about this, but it was apparently clear that she had made a horrible mistake, in which case I salute Maynard for recognizing that.

In 1986, before China was set up for adoptions, I adopted a six-day old infant there. I was not a selfless adopter; I wanted a healthy baby. There is an element of luck that she has turned out to be a profoundly fabulous adult.

On the National Geographic stage two nights ago, Maynard acknowledged her lack of foresight with adjectives like "naive" and "arrogant." With honesty and courage, she filled in some, but not all, of the blanks with harsh details about the Ethiopian road trip and the decision to find another home for her daughters.

Maynard did not talk about what went wrong during the 14 months the girls lived with her. Maybe many years from now she will write that story.

Meanwhile, yes, we may judge her for making a terrible decision to adopt those girls, but once the adoption had occurred, should she have asked those girls to spend more time in a situation she knew was wrong?

I believe Maynard did a brave and responsible thing, cutting everyone's losses and finding what hopefully is a good and happy home for those kids. If the girls' lives turn out well, then Maynard will have had a hand in that positive outcome.

Once Maynard realized she was unable to provide the best life for the girls, what do you think she should have done?

See my bio for links to my articles on relationships, healthy recipes and more as well as to my blog Confessions of a Worrywart.

See also:

Share Your Thoughts
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted in your comment.

Your Privacy
Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.
Anonymous | Jun 12, 2012
I know the backstory...it interferred with her social life...what she did - and she ONLY GAVE IT BARELY A YEAR...was selfish and disgusting. Who ever allowed her to have those girls did not do their diligence either...shame on all of them..and Joyce hid what she did for a VERY LONG TIME...skirting questions about "how are the girls" "Oh just fine" ..never admitting they weren't even with her...but hey, she got some new stories and the worst is she turned it around as if it was "all for the kids" NO JOYCE...it was all for and about you and your selfish needs. Empty nest...temporarily filled with two kids...then when she realized she couldn't travel as easily as she once did she dumped them...they weren't all "Oh mommy, mommy, thank you for what you did" (Which is what she expected) the entire thing turned my stomach. I used to be a fan but now see Joyce and her history as what it is..ALL ABOUT JOYCE. All Joyce, all the time. I've even PAID to take her workshops..never again....
Anonymous | Jun 18, 2012
I also know Joyce and know some details of this situation. You are so right. Selfish woman. The girls didn't have attachment disorder or anything like that — she didn't want to do the work of parenting and helping them adjustment to a new life. Sad and disgusting.
Anonymous | Jun 12, 2012
Selfish..she tried to fill her empty nest syndrome with two children who she's now scarred for life. Frivolous and selfish. Horrible!
John R. | Jun 12, 2012
Parenting is not easy and definitely not for everyone. Maynard simply quit on those kids and probably scarred them for life. With time and love it would become evident that her plan was not to sell the girls. She simply gave up too soon. But that's ok because she found the girls another home. Let's just hope the next family is a little better than the last.
Clare | Jun 12, 2012
Should we then take a vote?????? Sometimes there is no good choice. I can only hope, for the kids' sakes, that Maynard sought help and advice from a knowledgeable professional, to determine that this was her only option. I do agree with your previous thought. Do we have a right to judge this particular women when we don't know all of the circumstances? Naivete and arrogance sound about right, however. I can only imagine the compassion and irresistable urge to help those in need. And perhaps this was a good thing...only time will tell.(I know a couple who took in their anorexic niece, and planned to just "cook really great meals for her." Lasted one month. Sweet, but clueless.)Potential adoptive parents need take time to make themselves aware of the challenges and pitfalls of adopting older children, especially from another country, culture ...language. Did these girls even understand what was happening? Consider the culture shock, language barrier, and racial chasm, and an indelible history for these sisters that may never be understood by a white American. The bonding process takes time, even without all of the barriers, and sometimes, never happens. Yes, it is a mistake to treat adoption like choosing a needy, abandoned dog at the shelter, despite the good intentions, IF that is what happened. I have heard examples of this exact thing. Are these girls better off having been "chosen", taken on a vacation of incredible privelege, and dumped? I hardly think so. That is why an adoption process in this country is so involved...getting to know one another, longer and longer visitations, ...bonding, and making sure it fits both parties. We may save lives by adopting, and damage the child's psyche if it fails, or would fairness and humanity be better served by "fostering"...monetary contributions to improve the kids lives? I don't know if such a concept is in practice. Perhaps it ought to be.
JOELYN | Jun 11, 2012
"I believe Maynard did a brave and responsible thing, cutting everyone's losses and finding what hopefully is a good and happy home for those kids. If the girls' lives turn out well, then Maynard will have had a hand in that positive outcome." Wow, cutting losses? I had no idea children should be categorized at business decisions. This is deplorable. "If the girls' lives turn out well, then Maynard will have had a hand in that positive outcome." Wow, what a damn martyr. Most likely those girls will suffer like most unwanted children, in foster homes and group homes until they are old enough for the state to turn them out. Bravo Joyce. Bravo. What terrible rationalization of selfish, disgusting behavior this article is. Just awful.
morgan | Jun 11, 2012
I don't view this any differently than a biological parent surrendering children to other parents. She decided it was best for the children and took action. She didn't dump them at the emergency room. She worked at finding new parents who could give the children what they needed. I think of her as a heroine, she saved those kids from a dreadful life. Now they have opportunities that they would never have known in their homeland.
Peachie | Jun 11, 2012
Maynard should not have adopted the girls being a single parent and her significant age difference. When she started encountering difficulties with the girls she should have obtained outside help. Children are not animals and should not be dispose of when it gets difficult. Also, please note that in America children are abused everyday by their biological parents and this is why we have Children Protection Services, abused or murdered children is not acceptable in any case, whether they are with birthe, adopted or foster parents.
Nikki | Jun 13, 2012
So, It's ok to "dispose" of animals when you're done with it or when they no longer fit your lifestyle? Too bad more people don't take commitment seriously.
Anonymous | Jun 11, 2012
Wow,kids returned like a pair of shoes in a store. Horrible
follow us
Subscribe to Newsletters
X
About Life Goes Strong Contributors
Newsletter Sign Up Friends
Newsletter Unsubscribe Contact Us
Mobile App Sitemap